A Tale of a Patriarchal Hard-On

Some thoughts on the rapist-friendly, molester-enabling, coathanger-selling, health-shattering, woman-hating, forced-pregnancy law otherwise known Women's Health and Human Life Protection Act.

The law protects human life beginning at "that point in time when a male human sperm penetrates the zona pellucida of a female human ovum."

Unless, of course, the live human in question is a woman who wants an abortion - in which case she'd better be a sodomized Christian virgin.

Senator Bill Napoli explains how an exception to the ban could occur:

"A real-life description of an exception scenario to me would be a rape victim, brutally raped, savaged. The girl was a virgin. She was religious. She planned on saving her virginity until she was married. She was brutalized and raped, sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it, and is impregnated. I mean, that girl could be so messed up, physically and psychologically, that carrying that child could very well threaten her life."

Nappy bag-o-douche's patriarchal hard-on is evident as he describes his latest rape fantasy.

So...a married woman walking down the street gets raped and sorry...you're not a virgin? What if she is Jewish? What if she wasn't waiting until marriage...she isn't as worthy as a virgin? And what if she wasn't sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it? What if she wasn't sodomized at all? Can't non-virgins be "savaged"? Can't "that girl" be you...me..YOU??? What if we don't fall into the rape fantasy world of Bill Nappy bag-o-douche?

I'm still confused why Nappy bag-o-douche included sodomy in his Virgin Mary rape exception. Does he know how women get pregnant? Wasn't he taught that in his abstinence class?

Nappy goes on to describe how the molester-enabling law works:

"When I was growing up here in the wild west, if a young man got a girl pregnant out of wedlock, they got married, and the whole darned neighborhood was involved in that wedding. I mean, you just didn’t allow that sort of thing to happen, you know? I mean, they wanted that child to be brought up in a home with two parents, you know, that whole story. And so I happen to believe that can happen again. "

Ok...so a brother rapes his sister and she gets pregnant. Rally the torch-wielding town folk and force them to get married! Cause, you just "don't allow that sort of thing to happen"...what, you mean incest and rape? Or illigetimate children?....oh, the horror.

Again, if a college boy date-rapes a girl and she becomes pregnant...then, because they are not married and a child needs to be "brought up in a home with two parents"...not only should she, as a human without rights, be forced to carry a rape-child, but she should also be forced to marry her rapist?

This is not so far-fetched. The Ridiculous Reich has spawned new evil, otherwise known as: Republican Rep. Joey Fillingane

Joey bag-o-douche told the Biloxi Sun Herald that he believes it's wrong to allow abortion even in cases of rape or incest because "the product of that union is not of a criminal. The product is of God."

The product is not of a criminal??? A rapist is not a criminal???

So the Rape-friendly Reich is basically saying that the rapist isn't a criminal and the victim can't abort a rape-child because she wasn't a virgin, or sodomized, or religious (i.e. Christian) and the fetus is a product of G-d. Then, we will rally around and scream scriptures of righteousness while we force marriage because she is pregnant out of wedlock and you "just don't allow that sort of thing to happen, you know?"